An observation on the ever-so popular "What are you doing?"

I've noticed something interesting with the answers the favourite question "What are you doing?".


Be it on Twitter or Facebook, people mostly tell us what they're thinking, rather than what they're actually doing. Not that thinking is a non-activity. Surely people do other things while their minds are working?


Here's a challenge to all of you: Try telling others what you're thinking AND what you're doing while thinking. Perhaps that could give people an idea of what influences you - what triggers your thought process.


For instance (all-be-it a bad example) what am I doing? I'm being bored, waiting for a system task to complete and wondering what other people at this time of night are doing besides thinking in 140 characters or less.

Weaving a web of social networks

With the growing number of social networks winning clusters of users here and there, it's deepening the anxiety for those who thrive on staying connected - everywhere, all the time.

From Facebook to MySpace to Windows Live Spaces...

In essence, even though they compete, they're actually growing their numbers through acquaintances and referrals in the non-virtual world. As long as they remain the same. MyFace and Spacebook, all the same.

Since Facebook introduced the "What are you doing?" log, it'll be interesting to find out how many Facebookers have dropped the single-featured Twitter. Perhaps some, but those Twitters that have large followings are likely to keep on Twittering. They've certainly become celebrities in their own right - like The Truman Show, except the Twitter's aware of it.

Purpose-built networks are here to stay. The Twitters and the Blogspots. Hence my choice to post here and share it with other clusters of friends in Facebook and Live Spaces.

Welcome the era of Social InterNetworking.

Stepping on toes with HuddleChat

As posted on Google's huddlechat.com:

"Hi, a couple of our colleagues wrote Huddle Chat in their spare time as a sample application for other developers to demonstrate the power and flexibility of Google App Engine. We've heard some complaints from the developer community about it and because of that we've decided to take it down..."

The completely free group-web-based chat developed by Google developers was seemingly taken down so as to not step on any Campfire toes. A poll is currently being run on Mashable as to whether it should've been taken down or not. I'm inclined to say vote NO.

One might ask Is the concept patented? I'm not sure. Even if it were patented, could they actually enforce their patent?

This reminds me of the Blackboard-Desire2Learn patent dispute. The Software Freedom Law Center has done well to protect at least educational institutions that use Sakai, effectively resulting in Blackboard's pledge.

Group chat is most certainly an effective tool for learners and educators to collaborate. We'll see what happens when the free use of this basic concept is challenged (again)...